WHO Poll
Q: 2023/24 Hopes & aspirations for this season
a. As Champions of Europe there's no reason we shouldn't be pushing for a top 7 spot & a run in the Cups
24%
  
b. Last season was a trophy winning one and there's only one way to go after that, I expect a dull mid table bore fest of a season
17%
  
c. Buy some f***ing players or we're in a battle to stay up & that's as good as it gets
18%
  
d. Moyes out
38%
  
e. New season you say, woohoo time to get the new kit and wear it it to the pub for all the big games, the wags down there call me Mr West Ham
3%
  



Leavemyarcelona 7:05 Tue Sep 12
England v Jocks
Obviously be nice to get one over them but anyone really that bothered?

Replies - In Chronological Order (Show Newest Messages First)

martyboy 7:20 Tue Sep 12
Re: England v Jocks
Yes the Jocks will want to win. Watch them to a man sing their hearts out to their national anthem. And our over paid unpatriotic wankers won't even sing our nation anthem. That's why I don't watch or follow England football.

Leonard Hatred 7:23 Tue Sep 12
Re: England v Jocks
International football is moribund.

bigfrank 7:35 Tue Sep 12
Re: England v Jocks
Marty

Spot on. However, lose and put in a sub-standard performance, nosegate will be underpressure big time

Lee Trundle 7:48 Tue Sep 12
Re: England v Jocks
All the players sang the national anthem GOD SAVE THE KING on Saturday.

But Rashford was on the bench...

Leavemyarcelona 8:00 Tue Sep 12
Re: England v Jocks
Not wholeheartedly though

violator 8:09 Tue Sep 12
Re: England v Jocks
As long as they take the knee, that's the important thing

BRANDED 8:14 Tue Sep 12
Re: England v Jocks
I cant think any senior English player gives a flying rat’s arse about this fixture. Utterly meaningless bollocks.

Eastside surge 8:19 Tue Sep 12
Re: England v Jocks
Means so so much more to them than it does to us, and sadly became a non event long ago.

Leavemyarcelona 8:29 Tue Sep 12
Re: England v Jocks
I think it means more to the older generation to a degree

Kearley 8:57 Tue Sep 12
Re: England v Jocks
It only means more to them because it is the biggest games they play in. They have never played a tournament knockout match, ever.

I don't buy into the fact that Irish, Scots and Welsh are more patriotic than our players. I remember that becoming a thing at Euro 96 just because of the movie Braveheart.

It certainly means more to their fans, because it is all they have. And they still haven't beaten us in well over 20 years. Even then we lost a 2nd leg play off 1-0 and went through 2-1 on aggregate, so got the result we needed.

cholo 9:31 Tue Sep 12
Re: England v Jocks
Years ago top Scottish players were on a par with the English lads and they were team mates and rivals at club level. It's not like that anymore, the England players won't feel the rivalry the way they would've years back.

It'll be interesting to watch but for me won't mean as much as it did in years gone by.

Leavemyarcelona 9:33 Tue Sep 12
Re: England v Jocks
Got to love Ally McCoist

Helmut Shown 9:54 Tue Sep 12
Re: England v Jocks
If they are looking for a serial killer in Scotland , Robertson woukd be the chief suspect. Eyes of a psycho

violator 10:00 Tue Sep 12
Re: England v Jocks
And McGinn looks like he's a wizard on the banjo

Side of Ham 10:03 Tue Sep 12
Re: England v Jocks
f they are looking for a duelling banjo player in Scotland then look no further than John McGinn

onsideman 10:04 Tue Sep 12
Re: England v Jocks
Not massively bothered about international football but would still like to ruin the jocks' night

Side of Ham 10:05 Tue Sep 12
Re: England v Jocks
Great observations violator!

goose 10:16 Tue Sep 12
Re: England v Jocks
You can already see the downside of not having a left footer at left back.

Mex Martillo 10:23 Tue Sep 12
Re: England v Jocks
Any streamtha might work in Spain...

Gaffer58 10:23 Tue Sep 12
Re: England v Jocks
Kalvin Philips had now played more international football then club football this season, bet Peps quite pleased that waistcoat man keeps his subs warmed up.

Page 1 - Next




Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: